Матвєєва Діана Володимирівна
- Specialty
- Pediatric dentistry, Dentistry, Oral surgery
testing mode
Doctors · Find medical organizations
Dentistry — Ужгород
Thursday, Nov 5, 2026
The ordinary list is in random order. Paid positions appear separately.
Doctors: 145
Токар Богдан Васильович
- Specialty
- Orthodontics, Dentistry
Думнич Іван Іванович
- Specialty
- Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Prosthodontics
Брецко Юрій Іванович
- Specialty
- Dentistry
Брецко Анастасія Святославівна
- Specialty
- Dentistry
Барановський Сергій Михайлович
- Specialty
- Prosthodontics, Dentistry, Oral surgery
Корень Інна Михайлівна
- Specialty
- Dentistry
Фартушняк Михайло Володимирович
- Specialty
- Orthodontics, Dentistry
Мазар Юрій Юрійович
- Specialty
- Prosthodontics, Dentistry, Oral surgery
Лозюк Анна Сергіївна
- Specialty
- Dentistry, Oral surgery
Мельничук Наталія Іванівна
- Specialty
- Orthodontics, Dentistry, Oral surgery
Костенко Олександр Євгенійович
- Specialty
- Orthodontics, Prosthodontics, Dentistry
Тивонович Іванна Романівна
- Specialty
- Pediatric dentistry, Dentistry
Бокоч Анатолій Васильович
- Specialty
- Pediatric dentistry, Prosthodontics, Dentistry
Гончарук Наталя Ярославівна
- Specialty
- Dentistry
Максимович Олександр Михайлович
- Specialty
- Dentistry
Бобич Богдан Ладіславович
- Specialty
- Dentistry
Лях Олеся Іванівна
- Specialty
- Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Dentistry
Думнич Михайло Іванович
- Specialty
- Pediatric dentistry, Dentistry, Oral surgery
Королінчак Ганна Михайлівна
- Specialty
- Dentistry, Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics
Questions and answers
When might a separately fabricated restoration be discussed instead of a direct filling?
Tissue loss and coverage needs matter, with selection following examination. Compare shape, preparation and stages. At an Uzhhorod consultation, ask why the option fits your tooth. More complex fabrication is not automatically better for every defect; reasons should connect design to actual support and the restorative task, not technology alone.
What allows a mature tooth to remain after its pulp is removed?
A mature tooth is also supported by living tissue around its root, so pulp removal does not automatically require extraction. Remaining structure and suitable restoration still need assessment. Ask which factors matter now; anatomical possibility is not a promise of success regardless of damage or later care.
How can you tell whether ordinary cleaning is sufficient for gum complaints?
Tissue and deposits need assessment, not selection by procedure name alone. Describe bleeding, swelling and changes. Clarify further checks or a separate plan. Understand reasons, home actions and reviews rather than only the next cleaning date, which cannot establish care scope without assessing the underlying condition.
What should you clarify when only tooth roots remain after breakdown?
Position, access and nearby structures need assessment. No visible crown does not establish one universal approach. Share records and symptoms. Ask about reasons, investigations and reviews rather than assuming simplicity from a small visible portion; the condition beneath the gum and planned access matter when arranging the procedure.
How do impressions and scanning differ from making a prosthesis itself?
They capture mouth-shape information for later work, not replace selection, preparation and final checks. Ask where the method fits your plan. A digital label cannot automatically explain support, care or every stage, so relate it to fabrication, try-ins and assessment rather than treating it as a complete description of care.
How can a child’s plan include both treatment and prevention?
Distinguish present problems from reducing future disease. Clarify priorities, sequence and adult help. Procedures have different purposes. Planning supports visits and care rather than assuming completed fillings remove every future decay factor; preventive steps should remain clear even after the main restorative treatment is finished.