testing mode

Dentistry — Мукачево

Friday, Nov 6, 2026

The ordinary list is in random order. Paid positions appear separately.

Doctors: 29

Григор'єва Васса-Василина Олександрівна

Specialty
Orthodontics, Prosthodontics, Dentistry
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Next

Questions and answers

Why distinguish treatment and appearance goals when planning restoration?

Damage, tissue condition and appearance preferences do not always need the same solution. At a Mukachevo consultation, distinguish health needs from optional visible changes. This avoids assuming colour improvement needs the same preparation as rebuilding lost structure or that one general term explains the reason for every procedure.

How can you obtain clear reasons for proposed canal retreatment?

Ask about present findings and their connection to earlier care. An old record alone does not explain a new recommendation. Compare options and restoration needs. Discussion should identify the tooth's problem rather than merely assert that older treatment needs redoing, clarifying what changed and what the proposed work aims to achieve.

How can hygiene advice from different sources be assessed?

Show products and conflicting recommendations to the dentist. Surfaces, tissue and skills matter. General advice may not explain access around your restorations. Request one demonstrated routine rather than an accidental mixture of videos and old recommendations that change each other without understanding their purpose or suitability for your mouth.

What should you ask about referral to another clinician for extraction?

Clarify reasons, records and follow-up responsibility. The next clinician assesses the tooth too; referral does not replace consultation. Share health and procedure information. Report symptom changes while waiting so arrangements reflect current condition rather than only the initial note and expected date without considering new complaints.

How can prosthetic proposals from several practices be compared?

Check equivalent goals and stages: support, preparation, temporary and final work, care and reviews. Material labels do not make plans equal. Clarify differences to choose by suitability rather than one estimate total that may cover different work without explaining what remains necessary afterwards.

How can a family’s first child tooth-care plan be made workable?

Request priorities, demonstration and the adult's role. Describe real difficulties rather than an ideal routine. Findings and risk inform planning. Reviews can check actual steps, whereas a long unclear list leaves daily action uncertain. Practical agreement matters more than collecting recommendations the family cannot repeat at home.