testing mode

Dentistry — Хуст

Friday, Nov 6, 2026

The ordinary list is in random order. Paid positions appear separately.

Doctors: 33

Гербей Юрій Васильович

Specialty
Dentistry, Oral surgery
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Вовчок Руслан Васильович

Specialty
Dentistry
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Королінчак Ганна Михайлівна

Specialty
Dentistry, Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Курта Ярослав Степанович

Specialty
Dentistry
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Локота Юрій Євгенович

Specialty
Prosthodontics, Dentistry, Oral surgery
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Цуцков Олександр Костянтинович

Specialty
Pediatric dentistry, Prosthodontics, Dentistry
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Previous

Questions and answers

Should all fillings be replaced on the basis of a brief visual check?

Each recommendation needs findings and purpose. Ask which restorations or tissues are affected and what can be monitored. At a Khust consultation, discuss priorities. Equal filling age does not mean equal intervention; scope follows condition, with reasons for each proposed action rather than a blanket replacement rule.

How can care be discussed when a previously treated tooth becomes painful?

Symptom source, internal history and restoration need checking. Describe changes and share records. Pain does not always require the same repeat intervention. Clarify causes and steps based on current findings rather than earlier canal treatment alone; assessment distinguishes options instead of selecting a procedure by the old label.

What should you clarify if home care was not explained after cleaning?

Ask the practice about brushing, spaces and difficult areas and request demonstration or review guidance. Understand actions between visits, not only another cleaning date. Do not fill gaps with random aggressive methods; these cannot provide suitable technique and may leave the reason for earlier missed sites unresolved.

How should online aftercare advice be assessed following extraction?

Compare it with written instructions for your procedure and clarify contradictions. Procedures and health differ; do not combine arbitrary wound-care schemes. Deterioration needs assessment, not just more searching. Breathing or swallowing difficulty needs emergency help without waiting for a dentist, regardless of how a similar online account describes recovery.

What should you clarify to understand possible additional prosthetic stages?

Request preparation-through-review scope, separating known needs from findings-dependent steps. Not every change can be excluded beforehand, but reasons should be understood. Agree a plan rather than a design label so continuation reflects specific information instead of becoming an unexpected action list disconnected from the initial task.

How can complaints noticed by different adults be discussed at a child’s visit?

Gather observations about eating, sleep, brushing and onset and share them without self-diagnosing. This clarifies history. After assessment, agree consistent home steps so recommendations do not change with the accompanying or evening caregiver but retain an understood purpose and sequence for everyone helping the child.