testing mode

Dentistry — Харків

Sunday, Nov 8, 2026

The ordinary list is in random order. Paid positions appear separately.

Doctors: 441

Терехова Людмила Олександрівна

Specialty
Prosthodontics, Dentistry, Therapeutic dentistry
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Крамаренко Олександр Петрович

Specialty
Prosthodontics, Dentistry, Therapeutic dentistry
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Ворожбіт Світлана Михайлівна

Specialty
Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Prosthodontics
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Беденко Вікторія Олександрівна

Specialty
Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Prosthodontics
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Бутко Андрій Олександрович

Specialty
Prosthodontics, Therapeutic dentistry, Oral surgery
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Огнєв Олександр Вікторович

Specialty
Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Prosthodontics
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Джафарова Камілла Гусейнівна

Specialty
Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Prosthodontics
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Козлов Юрій Олегович

Specialty
Pediatric dentistry, Orthodontics, Prosthodontics
Average rating
Not rated yet
Approved reviews
0
How the rating score is calculated

Ranking score: 0.000. Comparisons use a smoothed score: (sum of ratings + 40) / (review count + 10). With no reviews it is zero. It differs from the average rating and does not assess clinical quality.

View doctor profile

Previous Next

Questions and answers

How can you clarify a filling in Kharkiv when different clinicians explained separate parts of the plan?

Ask who explains the current restoration proposal and how it connects with other care. Show available records and establish the next contact. This directs the tooth-specific question appropriately rather than requiring you to assemble several explanations into an unchecked overall plan yourself.

How can a canal-stage explanation be connected with a later consultation with another clinician?

Clarify what information should be transferred and who explains the next part. Keep the current stage and open question recorded. Check how arrangements connect so changing clinicians does not require you to interpret unfamiliar abbreviations or guess the continuation still needing explanation.

How can cleaning instruction remain connected when another clinician performs the next check?

Bring the current cue and demonstrate the movement practised, identifying the remaining difficulty. Request feedback and clarification so the next lesson builds on your performance rather than an assumption about an earlier spoken demonstration whose details the new clinician may not know.

How can an extraction recommendation be clarified when different dentists handle consultation and later discussion?

Show the conclusion and ask who explains the current proposal and unresolved questions. Clarify information transfer between consultations. Keep the current arrangement so further decisions rely on an understandable assessment explanation rather than only a clinician’s title or the fact of a booking.

How can an appliance consultation connect with earlier explanations from other dentists?

Show the records and identify your main question about the proposed device. Ask which information has been considered and what needs clarification. Record subsequent contacts so clinicians’ involvement remains understandable without requiring you to construct a plan from separate recommendations whose connection has not been explained.

How can a child understand why different clinicians take part in dental consultations?

Ask for each person’s role in the current plan to be explained briefly and describe the next contact simply. Keep the child’s question for the relevant dentist. Adults can retain full records so the child does not have to reconcile professional explanations of separate parts of care.